top of page

Exploring the Advantages of Bottom-Up Approaches in Trauma Therapy

Writer's picture: Dayle Lauren, RPN, CTSDayle Lauren, RPN, CTS

woman outdoors sitting with eyes closed and face towards sky

In the ever-evolving field of trauma therapy, practitioners are continually refining their approaches to better address the complex and nuanced needs of individuals who have experienced trauma. Two prominent methodologies have emerged in recent years: bottom-up and top-down approaches. Here, I delve into the benefits of bottom-up approaches in trauma therapy, contrasting them with the traditional top-down methods. By understanding the merits of each approach, therapists and clients can make informed decisions about choosing interventions to meet their healing needs.


Understanding Trauma and Its Impact:


Before we dive into the differences of bottom-up and top-down approaches, it is crucial to comprehend the nature of trauma and how it affects individuals. Whether stemming from a single catastrophic event or prolonged exposure to distressing circumstances, trauma can significantly impact one's mental, emotional, and physical well-being. Symptomology can vary on a continuum between individuals as well, and range from mild levels of anxiety to full dissociation that presents like psychosis. Conventional top-down approaches commonly found in Western medical models often focus on cognitive interventions, emphasizing the role of the mind in overcoming trauma. However, recent research suggests that integrating bottom-up approaches, which target the body's physiological responses, can significantly enhance therapeutic outcomes.


The Top-Down Approach:


Top-down approaches in trauma therapy primarily target the cognitive aspects of trauma, emphasizing verbal communication, cognitive restructuring, and the exploration of thoughts and emotions. Therapists employing this method often rely on techniques such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and talk therapy to help clients reframe negative thought patterns and develop healthier coping mechanisms. While top-down approaches have proven effective for many individuals, they may not adequately address the physiological manifestations of trauma. Sensations such as chronic pain, the development of autoimmune disorders, some Cancers, skin conditions, bowel and GI issues and heart conditions are all known to be linked to chronic stress and trauma, but are only treated through a medical lens that does not look at the trauma history as needing to be treated. Top-down approaches also do not accommodate for someone who is operating in a chronic stress response, as is the case for many individuals experiencing PTSD or C-PTSD symptoms. When in a stress response (fight, flight or freeze response), the frontal cortex (rationalizing, conceptualizing and decision making area) is not fully 'online', but rather, the more primitive and instinctual amygdala or mammalian brain center takes over, making cognitive approaches near impossible to navigate. This is where bottom-up approaches provide immense value, offering a complementary approach that focuses on navigating the body's response to stress and trauma, which in turn offers a more natural, innate system of re-regulating the nervous system and shutting down the trauma response, essentially allowing the cerebral cortex or higher brain to become activated again.


The Role of Bottom-Up Approaches:


Bottom-up approaches center around the understanding that trauma is not only stored in the mind but is also deeply embedded in the body's nervous system. Proponents of this approach argue that to achieve comprehensive healing, it is essential to address both the cognitive and physiological aspects of trauma. This is the foundation on which Brave Steps has built its program: a blended hybrid of the most effective therapies found within both approaches, curated in a mindful manner that takes into account the experiences of the traumatized individual along the trauma continuum.


Somatic Experiencing

One prominent bottom-up approach is Somatic Experiencing (SE), developed by Dr. Peter Levine. Founded on a deep understanding of how mammals innately process the physiological energies of a trauma response, the methodologies used in SE recognizes that trauma can lead to dysregulation in the autonomic nervous system, resulting in a heightened state of arousal or a frozen state of collapse. By therapist-assisted focusing on bodily sensations and promoting the release of stored energy, SE aims to restore balance to the nervous system in a gentle and safe manner.


Sensorimotor Psychotherapy

Another notable bottom-up approach is Sensorimotor Psychotherapy, founded by Pat Ogden. This approach integrates traditional talk therapy with body-centered techniques. Through mindfulness and body awareness exercises, individuals can explore how trauma has affected their physical experiences and develop strategies to regulate their responses. This type of psychotherapy allows for the integration of Compassionate Inquiry and Body Awareness.


The Brave Steps process incorporates much of the same principles founded on Levine and Ogden's work, as well as deep understanding of recognized patterns found in those struggling with mental health issues due to traumatic backgrounds, as observed by Brave Steps' founder, throughout her career as a Registered Psychiatric Nurse. Identifying and understanding the meaning of symptoms based in trauma is key to successfully treating trauma. This deep knowing is imbued in bottom-up approaches where they physiological underpinnings of trauma is better understood. It is through this approach that space is created , allowing for the gentle and powerful use of compassionate inquiry to resolve deeply held beliefs and trauma patterns. It is only then that tenets of top-down approaches can be utilized to provide logic and thought repatterning to help tether the healing.


Benefits of Bottom-Up Approaches:


Holistic Healing

Bottom-up approaches offer a holistic perspective, recognizing that trauma affects not only the mind but also the body. By addressing physiological responses, therapists can guide clients toward a more integrated and comprehensive healing process. This approach can also garner more involvement by the client in therapy as the exploration piques the natural curiosities of the client, allowing for re-framing of their beliefs around their experiences, while empowering them to take control of their body and lives.


Bypassing Verbal Barriers

Trauma can often hinder individuals from articulating their experiences verbally. Bottom-up approaches provide alternative avenues for expression, allowing clients to process trauma through non-verbal means such as movement, breathwork, and body awareness. This approach is often easier for the traumatized patient to innately participate in, without having to retell their entire story. By mindfully guiding a client to pay attention to the subtleties of the felt sense, the experience of trauma is shifted dynamically from an event that happened to you (externalization) to a response that happens within (somatic experience). The trauma no longer is a story, but a deeply personal event encased in an organic felt experience.


Regulation of the Nervous System

Bottom-up approaches excel in regulating the autonomic nervous system, which is dysregulated in individuals with a history of trauma. By targeting the physiological aspects of trauma, therapists can help clients achieve a sense of safety and regulation. Clients begin to feel the power of control being in their own possession rather than being externally attached to the mechanisms of the event itself. This awareness, on its own, offers the client much healing with the shift of power possession. It is in mindful exploration of the inner world that the client begins to understand their lived experiences as the body's capacity to keep itself alive, and this realization fosters a level of self-compassion that necessitates the progression of the healing journey.


An essential advantage of bottom-up approaches is their compatibility with top-down methods. In the dynamic arena of trauma therapy, the choice between bottom-up and top-down approaches is not a binary one, but instead, therapists can benefit from understanding the advantages each approach offers and how they can be seamlessly integrated to optimize therapeutic outcomes. By embracing a more holistic perspective that recognizes the intricate interplay between the mind and body, trauma therapists can embark on a journey towards fostering profound healing and resilience in their clients, while clients, simultaneously, can experience major shifts towards resolution and healing from their past.

Comments


bottom of page